Use Case Study#3 Forensic Psychology: Information Recall / Eyewitness Testimony June was a witness to violent crime. Twelve months later she was called by the state as a witness and took the stand swearing under oath that the defendant was the man leaving the scene of the murder holding something in his hand. There was no DNA evidence or weapon to be found. Yet due to a weak defense and June’s eye witness testimony, the verdict was guilty and the defendant was sentenced to life in prison. On appeal the defendant hired a better lawyer who now attacks June’s testimony and the accuracy of her memories. He points out that she was wrong about important details and was in fact influenced by wording of the questions. Must be ten to twelve double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. View the Critical Thinking Community website for further assistance. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis and summarizes supporting evidence. Must use at least six peer-reviewed journal articles as sources, including a minimum of four from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library. GET THIS OR ORDER A SIMILAR PAPER NOW