These are the pain points. No plagiarism please. The background of the paper and
These are the pain points. No plagiarism please. The background of the paper and relevant information. Is the analysis descriptive of hypothesis testing? The types of data (WGS, epidemiological, phenotypic etc) and the methods they used to analyze them. Focus on the main figures and tables and comment on the appropriateness of their methods. You should make connections to concepts learned in the course. Have the methods changed since the paper was published? Could the authors have used a different approach? The findings and conclusions. Were they appropriate given the data and methods used? What are the broader implications of the authors' findings? link to paper named Intercontinental dissemination of azithromycin-resistant shigellosis through sexual transmission: a cross-sectional study : https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(15)00002-X/fulltext#seccestitle130

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.