Please follow the Guidelines I give below to write. It's very important.
And this is the feedback I receive last time: The second response paper fails to reflect adequately the gist of the assigned materials for Module two: the introduction part is very vague and confusing, containing a lot of irrelevant information; the same applies to the majority of the summarizing paragraphs; the analysis part rather reinstates some central topics than critically interpret them.
Taking into account it is the second inefficient response paper in a row, I strongly urge you to contact TA Stanislav Skritki (skritkis@msu.edu) to discuss with him the ways to improve subsequent works.
And Note that all readings are about this one module. Not for different module.