Leader Analysis Paper #1 -ELON MUSK During this course, you will have the opportunity to select a leader to analyze in terms of each addressed topic. In order to do so, you will need to identify a leader for which there is substantial information about his or her leadership style, traits and behaviors in order for you to conduct a review and analysis of his or her leadership competencies. On Units 3, 6, 9, and 13 you will be asked to respond to various questions about your particular leader and draw correlations between your leader and what you have learned. For this week’s paper (Leader Analysis Paper #1) you will focus on how your leader did (or did not) display aspects of Fundamentals of Leadership (Unit 1), Emotional Intelligence (Unit 2), and Effective Thinking (Unit 3). You will need to cite your conclusions with references from the week’s reading material. Your choice of leader will need to be approved by the instructor. If, at any point, you find that you do not have enough material to continue your evaluation of this particular leader, you may change to a different leader but only with the approval of your instructor. For Leader Analysis Paper #1, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following: 1. Who is your leader and what leadership role/s has this person had? 2. What is your interest in this leader? Why do you want to choose this person? 3. What preliminary comprehensive sources have you found to support your weekly research? In other words, do you have sufficient materials and references to continue to assess and analyze this person and his/her leadership style, traits and behaviors throughout this course? 4. Application, citations and references to Units 1, 2, and 3 reading materials. Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Fundamentals of Leadership (Unit 1), Emotional Intelligence (Unit 2), and Effective Thinking (Unit 3). See the Grading Rubric below. Rubric Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours. 5 pts Excellent Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately described. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimally described. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not accurately describe. 0 pts No marks 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplied course material to what you learned about the leader. 5 pts Excellent Fully applied. No improvement necessary 4 pts Good Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not apply course material. 0 pts No marks 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsed citations from the week's reading materials. 5 pts Excellent Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not cite appropriately. 0 pts No marks 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrote with sufficient detail. 5 pts Excellent Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not provide sufficient detail. 0 pts No marks 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsed appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style 5 pts Excellent Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary. 3 pts Accceptable Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not use appropriate writing style. 0 pts No marks 5 pts Total Points: 25 PreviousNext GET THIS OR ORDER A SIMILAR PAPER NOW