I need a paper on analyzing an argument presented in the podcast episode you cho
I need a paper on analyzing an argument presented in the podcast episode you chose. Explain each point of view presented, identify which appeals each "side" is using, and, finally, explain which argument made a stronger use of ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos. the goal of the essay is to analyze how well each 'side' (in this case, Armani's choice vs. what the public wanted) used rhetorical appeals more effectively - you have a sentence about this in your intro, but the rest of the draft is mostly just explaining what happened. Here's one way to think about the goals of each part of the essay: intro: what's the episode about? what are the two arguments? which side was stronger? P1: This side did a good job appealing to _______ because _______ P2: The other side appealed to ______________ but didn't appeal to ___________ P3: Finally, this side's appeal to ____________ was stronger because _______________ Conclusion: restated thesis, review best evidence, look to the future analyzing an argument presented in the podcast episode you chose. Explain each point of view presented, identify which appeals each "side" is using, and, finally, explain which argument made a stronger use of ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos. the goal of the essay is to analyze how well each 'side' (in this case, Armani's choice vs. what the public wanted) used rhetorical appeals more effectively - you have a sentence about this in your intro, but the rest of the draft is mostly just explaining what happened. Here's one way to think about the goals of each part of the essay: intro: what's the episode about? what are the two arguments? which side was stronger? P1: This side did a good job appealing to _______ because _______ P2: The other side appealed to ______________ but didn't appeal to ___________ P3: Finally, this side's appeal to ____________ was stronger because _______________ Conclusion: restated thesis, review best evidence, look to the future On the podcast https://www.wnyc.org/widgets/ondemand_player/wnycstudios/#file=/audio/json/624449/&share=1 Overall is has to be 4 pages it has to be ethos vs pathos or On the podcast https://www.wnyc.org/widgets/ondemand_player/wnycstudios/#file=/audio/json/624449/&share=1 This can help the goal of the essay is to analyze how well each 'side' (in this case, Armani's choice vs. what the public wanted) used rhetorical appeals more effectively - you have a sentence about this in your intro, but the rest of the draft is mostly just explaining what happened. Here's one way to think about the goals of each part of the essay: intro: what's the episode about? what are the two arguments? which side was stronger? P1: This side did a good job appealing to _______ because _______ P2: The other side appealed to ______________ but didn't appeal to ___________ P3: Finally, this side's appeal to ____________ was stronger because _______________ Conclusion: restated thesis, review best evidence, look to the future

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *