Hi, my course is Business 108 - Legal Environment of Business. This is a small discusion assignment about Burden of Proof Here are the questions for this discussion: "The burden of proof in civil cases is fairly low. A plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and then he collects 100 percent of his damages. Is this result reasonable? Should a plaintiff in a civil case be required to prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt? Or, if a plaintiff is only 51 percent convincing, should he get only 51 percent of his damages?" Please answer those questions. Thank you!