Answer the following questions. Remember: 250-300 words each. APA format 1. In
Answer the following questions. Remember: 250-300 words each. APA format 1. In 250-300 words, explain why functionalists think deviance and crime provide a number of societal benefits. Then, explain why you agree or disagree with this perspective, providing examples to support your position. 2. In 250-300 words, Using information from the textbook, describe a situation where crime and/or deviance would be functional. Rubric Assignment Grading Rubric 40 Points (2) Assignment Grading Rubric 40 Points (2) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 15 to >13.5 pts Exceeds Expectations Responses reflect sufficient detail and directly address the assignment prompts. Provided relevant concise responses. 13.5 to >11.25 pts Meets Expectations Responses were somewhat relevant and/or topic was partially answered. Responses stayed on point at times. 11.25 to >0 pts Falls Short of Expectations Responses lacked logic and coherence. Responses digressed from prompts. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Timeliness and Relevance 5 to >4.5 pts Exceeds Expectations Assignment uploaded on or before due date; organized, clear responses were complete. 4.5 to >3.75 pts Meets Expectations Assignment submitted at the assigned due date; somewhat organized responses were somewhat clear. 3.75 to >0 pts Falls Short of Expectations Assignment uploaded far after due date. Disorganized responses were too minimal or unclear. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing and Critical Thinking Skills 15 to >13.5 pts Exceeds Expectations Posed issues from multiple viewpoints using theories and principles detailed in the assigned readings. Provided provocative responses to questions. 13.5 to >11.25 pts Meets Expectations Posed a few issues from single or limited viewpoints. Writing was unclear or lacking focus. 11.25 to >0 pts Falls Short of Expectations Failed to pose issues or posed them from single viewpoints reflecting unclear presentation and/or thinking. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources 5 to >4.5 pts Exceeds Expectations Sources were from credible authors and research was substantial in order to present factual data/information. 4.5 to >3.75 pts Meets Expectations Sources were from mostly credible authors and research was thoughtfully conducted in order to present factual data/information. 3.75 to >0 pts Falls Short of Expectations Sources were not credible or questionable. 5 pts Total Points: 40

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *